Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. T.COS


Primary Symbol: V.COS Alternate Symbol(s):  CNBMF

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. is a Canada-based exploration and mining company. The Company is focused on nickel, copper, and cobalt in northern Quebec. It is advancing Graal Nickel & Copper Project. The Graal Nickel & Copper Project (the Property) is located in the north of Saguenay Lac St-Jean region. It is comprised of 110 map-designed claims covering 6,113 hectares. The Property is also located at 190 kilometers (km) north from the seaport terminal of Grande-Anse (Saguenay).


TSXV:COS - Post by User

Post by oldtimer21on Nov 11, 2011 10:03am
332 Views
Post# 19229382

implications of keystone xl delay

implications of keystone xl delayCan anyone clearly  describe what the short-term and long-term implications are for COS as a result of the Keystone pipeline delay etc?
Specifically, is there any near-term implications whatsoever?  It seems to me there are not any, if I understand the earlier post correctly that COS sells upgraded SSB and therefore is unaffected in the near term as the XL pipeline is designed to carry diluted bitumen, is this correct?
If so then the longer-term expansion would be affected as COS intends to expand SSB production to 400,000 bpd ( no affect) however the 200,000 of non-upgraded bitumen would be.  That said both of these seem sufficiently far out that either the delay or alternative transportation routes will be developed resulting in a non-issue as a practical matter.  Thoughts?  
Bullboard Posts