Has anyone considered...Has anyone considered that a forum/board may potentially be held liable for promoting/pumping a stock if no one posts anything negative, to "balance out a discussion"? From the real investors who have done their due diligence on this board there have been some tough questions asked and discussions made, but when you omit the intentional disinformation and scare tactics (negative filler) from the paid bashers (who could potentially be Stockhouse employees or subcontractors) I have not found anything "bad" that can legitimately be said about INT or its management, IMO.
Stockhouse could simply just be protecting themselves (this actually works to their benefit two-fold as the amount of posts/visits increases tremendously).
Even some of what is promoted as "bad", I completely disagree with. For example, I voted FOR the "New Plan" as I believe it is a vital tool for the principals to continue the momentum forward.
Do your own due diligence.
Enjoy the ride.