ANBCA's Post is Full of Deceptionmonies444, I noticed you were defending ANBCA's post. Could you please tell us why, because what he posted was nothing but deceptive and calculating.
Please read it again. Notice that he said that today's news was useless and then retracted, which is just not true. The news was not retracted except for the wording regarding the size of the deposit which has not been calculated yet according to 43-101 estimates.
Secondly, and this is why I too am skeptical of what some post, is that ANBCA said that he trimmed his CEV holdings. He went on to say that he will wait for a dip to 50 to 70 cents and then decide whther to buy back in? Well, if he ever held, and if he truly believes that the share price will drop to 50 to 70 cents, then why did not sell his entire position?
Personally, I think ANBCA is lying firstly about the extent of today's retraction, and secondly about his intentions of selling and buying. I don't trust this type of poster. But then again, that's the negatve part of us all being Anonymous. Just my 2 cents. GLTA
ANBCA
<strong>Reputation</strong>: A calculation of the weighted quality, performance, and participation scores on a scale of one to ten.</p>")">3
11/23/2011 4:12:53 PM | | 135 reads | Post #30400031
Huge volume today. A useless NR that was retracted after appearing to push the limits of the exchange too far. Now we watch and see if the Insider Filings over the next several weeks light up! These well seasoned executives knew the rules and thus the News Release leaves an unanswered question. Why?
This will be very interesting to watch. I trimmed my holdings today and will wait for a dip to the .50 to .70 cent mark to decide if I'm back in.
Good luck to everyone.
JMHO
A