RE: confident excerpts?not what they appear to be! Matamec has NOT solved that problem. Those are the words of Jacob Securities analyst Luisa Moreno. Not the words of Matamec. Matamac has not ECONOMICALLY solved the problem. What Matamec has actually done is show with preliminary results that it is possible to recover rare earth, yttrium and zirconium values from eudialyte concentrates originating from samples at its Zeus property. This being significant because REE-Y-Zr were considered very difficult to recover from eudialyte due to the formation of a silica gel in the leaching step during processing. The new process developed for the Kipawa eudialyte concentrate reduces the consequences of forming silica gel. This resulted in a recovery rate of 67.7% of the zirconium and an average of 61.1% of the rare earth yttrium . The separation of these elements economically speaking is still in the research and development stage. How long will Toyota wait before they can be guaranteed economic viability - a pre-requirement before inking a deal with Matemac. Why would they stipulate that the company has to prove to TTC that extraction and separation can be accomplished – economically and to specific requirements if it was already a perfected process. It is not at this time.If the economics don't pan out, Toyota will leave MAT's eudialytes hosted in syenite silicate for other small cap juniors with HREE's in host bastaenite or monazite where proven commercially economic extraction methods already exist.Another point to consider....the economically viable concentrate that TTC is after, and MAT has yet to provide, would yield Matamec 20% or less the actual value of the fully processed rare earth elements, in step with industry standards.