RE: So you agree with me...Some quick geological info gathered from the Saskatchewan geological database...
These basement boulders HAVE to be sourced from the PLS property because:
The properties to the north (in the direction of glacial flow) are underlain by Athabasca Sandstone, according to the drillhole information and mapping. The PLS property is underlain by both basement rocks and Athabasca Sandstone. These boulders are composed of basement material based on the news releases. So there is no logical way for them to be derived from the neighbouring properties to the north. Unless of course, you believe in magical boulders.
Given that there is 100m to the unconformity nearby to these basement boulders, this suggest to be a large structural offset, which is quite common in deposits of the Athabasca Basin. This area is known to have a fair amount of glacial cover, so it has masked any of these structural features on surface, so the only way to find it is by drilling. Map out with a few drill holes where the off-set is, and then drill it out...
To clarify about the Cluff Lake boulder train.. the distance between the Cluff Lake boulder train to the deposit is 2-3 kilometers. The distance from the FIS/ESO boulder train to the historically identified conductors (the postulated source) is 5 kilometers. So, given the shorter distance of an already established anomaly-to-source feature, there is more weight to the fact that these boulders are sourced from the property.
I am of the opinion that this will lead to the discovery of the next major uranium deposit.