Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Arcan Resources Ltd ARNBF



OTCPK:ARNBF - Post by User

Comment by good40on Dec 21, 2011 8:35pm
132 Views
Post# 19343783

RE: The Bottom Line

RE: The Bottom Line

Well,  you divide the capital expense required,  by the total yearly number of the increased production. Capex was $225 million... increased production was 438,000 barrels. So the cost of adding production is about $500/bbl.  Doesn't really matter if it's $400/bbl or $200/bbl,  it's much too high.

 

Somehow they must 5 times production and reduce capital expense.  Your statement of reserves being worth $5 per share is not justified by the value of their proved reserves oilman2011. 

 

I guess to put it as simple as I can... you have to advertize Probable reserves to a potential bidder,  with the intent of showing an historic workable business plan of increasing production.  Show that plan oilman2011.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>