Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Longford Energy Inc V.LFD



TSXV:LFD - Post by User

Post by 1BestPickson Dec 29, 2011 1:56pm
403 Views
Post# 19357370

LFD & VAST are 100% Diffrent

LFD & VAST are 100% Diffrent

Most people are mixing up the facts, like mixing the fruit of Apple and Oranges and getting lemons.

 

Many people are out of focus and using the same VAST metrics to evaluate LFD.

 

LFD is 100% completely different then VAST, in every way, shape and form. They are 100% different like night and day.

 

You can not use the same markers or metrics to evaluate LFD and VAST.

 

I for one have never wanted to see LFD merge with VAST, but I doubt I will have an option.

 

SOROS and other invested into LFD at much higher prices; since then the metrics for LFD have got better not worse. This fact is 100% independent of VAST.

 

LFD is easily worth $1 per share, to a Chinese partner.

 

The real question is can Forbes get the real value for LFD shareholders.

 

If Lundin had Chia, shareholders would get $1 per share.

 

I suspect 70 cents would be the low end bid, before China bids it up.

 

Soon we will see what is baking.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>