Question 6 Answered After Question 6, then the MWR "insiders" on the various Chat Board need to answer six questions from me. Until that agreement is guaranteed and the names are disclosed, it's been fun this weekend.
Question 6: Why $16,000 a month Salary ...you realize that the top Canadian CEO's earned on average $40,000 on the “first” day of 2012 and everyday after. I believe that if this company MWR does well that $16,000 per month is a respectful remuneration for Brent Johnson …What was your annual salary last year Mr Davis would you like to break it down to a monthly and share it with me and all of the readers
Answer: Based on the revenue generated by Brent Johnson, since 1995, his salary is not respectful. Anything Brent Johnson has promised the investors/insiders since 2000 is just Blue Sky at the present.
Judge Shaffer on March 4, 2011 told Brent Johnson the truth that MWR has no claim against the Estate of Fitzgerald based on the failed 1999 BC litigation. MWR can only sue Tronox (in bankruptcy) and C. Robert Cox for malpractice. That recovery might pay for several years of Brent's monthly salary (10 years = $1.92 Million) lol
If you include the legal fees and costs incurred by MWR since 1999 in their hopeless fight against Fitzgerald (another $800,000) - Brent Johnson should work for MWR without pay until he recovers the same amount (at least $3 Million)
I am a very successful consultant and deal very successful in the aloe vera and other businesses through two very large trusts. I live a lot more comfortable than Brent Johnson. I have very loyal Kanco Stockholder who know my standard of living based on documented performance since I incorporated Kanco Energy, Inc. in 1982. Brent Johnson doesn't take $16,000. per month in Cash. MWR cannot afford his salary.
There will be very little income with MWR in 2012 based on the direct attack ABX is putting on MWR at the present.