GREY:TWNNF - Post by User
Comment by
taylor1988on Jan 10, 2012 3:10am
678 Views
Post# 19384953
RE: RE: RE: Taylor 1988 (Fact versus Fiction)
RE: RE: RE: Taylor 1988 (Fact versus Fiction) Fort Knox cash cost per ounce in 3rd quarter 2011 at grade of .49 was $700~
Fort Knox cash cost per ounce at grade of .43 will be $750~.
Do some real research for a change? You're right.. instead of worry about my own equities I should be more concerned about spoon-feeding you and others due dilligence. The whole point of this argument was that you stated a resource of under 0.5 g/t au could NOT be mined. I said it could be mined especially given the nugget effect on their property and I was right as Kinross mined a resource of well under 0.5 g/t au in a much less favourable jurisdiction. I never made any reference to what the actual milled grade would be.
Unfortunately in GBB's case I can't be held accountable for their inability to execute on a 43-101 still to this date. So far the only thing that stock has showed me is that great properties can be squandered by incompetent boots on the ground (geo's) and seemingly passive management. With positions in NES/TRR I haven't left management dropping the ball to chance as TRR and NES are both world-class deposits with superior management teams to most gold juniors.
Anything else useful to add to the TRR board?