Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Longford Energy Inc V.LFD



TSXV:LFD - Post by User

Comment by good40on Jan 11, 2012 4:12pm
312 Views
Post# 19393226

RE: 20% or 40%

RE: 20% or 40%

You've got to admit,  it does make sense.  By purchasing the 2nd 20% of LFD's 40% interest,  Genel would be responsible for $25 million in back payments,  and must assume a 40% royalty rate.  In that sense,  the 2nd 20% of LFD's is not worth anywhere near what the first 20% is worth.

 

Genel would be much better off ,  value wise,  to purchase only a 20% interest... and leave LFD with a 20% interest.  LFD could then pay off the $25 million and carry on,  debt free.  Of course,  they would still have to raise funds to participate and still be left with that darned 40% royalty rate.  At least they could carry on for awhile,  which is better than the current situation.  When things look too good to be true,  they usually aren't true.  I seriously doubt that the deal will support the current price.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>