RE: RE: interesting statements replace 52 elements I do not have the original document, but in a nut shell the original news release stated they could physically see indicators of a number of different elements. The wording read like they were excited! The next line stated the lab was going to test for as many as "52" different elements.
I read it numerous times and from the earlier reports on here I was not the only person. What I find troubling is that they have been permitted to change the original release. They should have released an addendum clearifying the original statement and why they were changing their position.
When you read the new wording it still indicates they have found something but they are not saying what nor how much. However they are saying what they have found is visually abundant obviously and it is in numerous drill locations and samples. Reading between the lines....lots of it!
I guess we can only wait and see. Hope that helps.