Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Seafield Resources Ltd V.SFF



TSXV:SFF - Post by User

Comment by Buddy_Foxon Jan 25, 2012 11:05pm
287 Views
Post# 19450442

RE: Similar Trends

RE: Similar Trends

Pick your valuation for $/oz of gold in ground

then multiply it by the gold in ground pretty simple, from there you give bonuses or penalties for things like location, type of potential mine, the infrastructure trifecta (water, road and power)

Compare it to neighbours valuations,

BAT hasn't even put out a solid NI 43101 and its trading at a 3.4x mcap of SFF. On simalar grades, just a lot more of it at the moment. we have 15,000m of drill finished, they have 55k.

 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>