RE: Victor2009 Johnny Junior,
As well as letting you know you can't spell that word you're using to try and impress people with your grasp of the English language - I have attacked your allegations about Fire River Gold. I've told you that using $1,680 an ounce on FAU's in situ gold resources is wrong - indicating that your grasp of mining basics matches your grasp of spelling.
I've also told you there are ten [by my count] reports that are identified as being in compliance with NI43-101 requirements. This will be like providing a link to the missing link, but if you go to this site, and can read, you can see for yourself.
Link:https://www.sedar.com/DisplayCompanyDocuments.do?lang=EN&issuerNo=00027349
If you manage to get to the Sedar site [I can't imagine anyone that claims to have done due diligence but admits to have never being to Sedar], check out one of the PDF attachments - that are identified as follows:
Mar 14 2011 Technical report (NI43-101) - English PDF 14849 K
There are about ten such reports listed.
As you say "Beware of any poster who does not answer the allegations made". So far this has been self-incriminating for you - you've never answered for your spelling error, nor for your lie stating FAU has no NI43-101. Can we expect a change, now that you've been proved wrong. I highly doubt it.