Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Advanced Explorations Inc. ADEXF

"Advanced Explorations Inc is a development stage company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of properties within the resource sector."


GREY:ADEXF - Post by User

Comment by MurrayMacon Feb 06, 2012 6:02pm
134 Views
Post# 19497016

1 Million vs. 5 Million tonnes.....

1 Million vs. 5 Million tonnes.....

1 Million vs 5 Million tons….

 

 

Math is a strong suit of mine……and I will take a 5 million tonnes/annum iron ore operation over a 1 million tonnes/annum any day of the year, when all major components are equal!!

 

 

1st - if LIM is selling their 65% iron ore at say $140/tonne, then AXI or any other producer would be also be selling their 67% iron ore at the same price or higher…..in the same calendar year, in the same calendar month.

 

 

2nd - LIM has an extremely high OPEX of $50/tonne [operating expenditures] for a DSO operation, for reasons stated previously [sub-contract operation, as oppose to owner run; and a rare DSO “washing” facility due to the nature of their particular ore body]. But to continue, I am willing to go on the hook here and suggest that AXI will NOT have an OPEX above $50/tonne, for reasons stated previously [no rail costs, and once again, infrastructure costs has no bearing on OPEX]. As I previously stated, yes LIM has an in ground grade of 55 - 57% and therefore should have a OPEX of somewhere around $25 - $30/tonne…..but they don’t. AXI or I cannot be held accountable for that. It doesn’t change the century old formula…..Profit = Selling Price – Operating Costs!

 

 

Cash flow is NOT based on “in ground” grade! It is based [primarily] on the difference between their marketable selling price and their operating costs…..less royalties of course.

 

 

Therefore, if one producer is putting out 1 million tonnes per year with an OPEX of $50 and selling it for $140 per tonne…….then I will most definitely be more interested in the producer putting out 5 million tonnes per year with the same OPEX and selling price.

 

 

Unless of course, the 1 million tonne producer had a much lower Market Cap than the 5 million tonne producer.

 

 

LIM present day market cap = $345 million

 

AXI present day market cap = $37 million

 

 

Notes and Disclosures – for the sake of fairness to both parties:

 

  1. LIM targeted their OPEX at $50/tonne, but in fact came in at $65/tonne for their 2011 production. [and in all fairness to LIM, they will more than likely succeed in reducing this to $55/tonne, as per their MD&A]
  2. LIM is targeting sellable quantity this year of 2 million tones, but once again, around 65%
  3. LIM does in fact have some “Lump Ore” production [25%] which garners a premium
  4. And this should be obvious to all…..LIM owns 100% of their project; AXI will own 50% once the XXP joint venture is in place
  5. LIM has maintained an extremely low CAPEX throughout all their initial startup operations
  6. AXI has in place, an agreement to be “fully carried” to production
  7. As of this posting, AXI has not presented any OPEX figures for the proposed concentrate mining operation……these figures should be released in this quarter

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>