RE: RE: Another Sinbob Rant Hey 'Bud'...what is your previous alias that you post under...here or elswhere?
There you go again, obfuscating and avoiding the issues brought to your attention. Why don't you answer this question I posed to you. Let's try again.....
Why don't you explain to all of us the merits of having family members on the BOD when they have no training or experience in mining? Don't you think that if SFMI replaced them with a geologist with 35 years of experience and a milling engineer with 40 years of experience it would be better for the company and the shareholders?
Why dont you come to theAGORac-m site and debate all those issues with all the longs who would love to do so?
I already told you what I think of the SFMI Agoracom board. No sense re-hashing that point.
You will not be ignored over there...and yo will get consensus on some of your assertions.
If you're suggesting that I'm ignored over here you're wrong. I'm getting a lot more reads than I thought I would. Further, I suggest that the reason no one is responding is because the points I bring up are difficult to defend. Much easier to sweep them under the carpet and hope no one notices. Finally, please feel free to put me on ignore. I don't mind at all. There are plenty of people that are reading my posts and I don't care if you do or not.
However, on those issus where real facts are concerned, you will be sorely challenged.
Perhaps you can get them to respond to the questions above. Better yet, maybe you can stand on your own two feet and answer them yourself.
You have this whole forum to yourself because of the past activity here that ruined this forum.
There is not a lot of posting going on here but there is a lot of surreptitious activity. It seems there are some that just have to see what's being written. I actually like the forum as my points are being made where they don't disappear.
I submit that you can not take the hit you would get from very knowledgeble investors at 'A' ..
Well, you'd be wrong, again..... I'm not worried about knowledge and I welcome any true facts. Let's just make sure that those facts are substantiated. I'm not interested in "group think" heresay.
so you shoot from the shadows.
Total GARBAGE.... Here I am, in open forum, stating my beliefs for all to read and respond to and you make an idiotic statement like that.
How brave of you.
Hey, someone has to say the unpopular things that need to be said. SFMI won't reach it's maximum potential if shareholders accept sub-standard performance.
you simply would not have credible answers to many very astute shareholders over there.
I can assure you that they do not have all the answers. If they did many of them would not have invested their hard earned money in SFMI upwards of 6 years ago, like you did, only to realize a 4 cent share price like today. Tying your cash up in an investmentthat reaps a 4 cent share price after 6 years is not astute investing. However, starting fresh at 4 cents today could possibly be interesting.....
I encourage all who come here to go 'over there' and get it all on the table...even those who cannoot stand the truth.
I like the truth, lay it on me. However, with SFMI it's difficult to ascertain what the truth is a lot of the time. Cloudy news releases, heresay, speculation, pumping, bashing, etc, does not lend itself well to accurate data.
Shootiing from the shadows creates a lot of doubt bout you, who you are
Sinbob!!!! I'm right here in front of you!!!! You need to come back to reality and forget the Boogey man stuff....
and why you are so decidedly negative on SFMI.
Okay, so if you had paid any attention at all to my posts and not just focused on the sensitive issues you would know that I own a large holding of SFMI, a heck of a lot more than you, that's for sure. I do believe the properties have potential but that is not to say that everything is wonderful with the company. I am merely pointing out some of the more asinine problems with the company. The only way one can deal with a problem is if they know they have a problem. I believe SFMI can do better for their shareholders but it will take some tough decisions. If shareholders decide to ignore problems they are likely to continue as the conduct will become the accepted norm.