Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

ESO Uranium Corp V.ESO



TSXV:ESO - Post by User

Comment by Coffiniteon Feb 17, 2012 5:20pm
418 Views
Post# 19552212

RE: Airborne surveys

RE: Airborne surveys

The airborne surveys ESO flew back in the day (2005 to 2008) were mostly Megatem, and the main reason they were so expensive is because they were flying their Cree Property, which was a huge area back then - maybe 10 times the size of Patterson Lake South.

The benefit of airborne work is that mineral exploration companies get 1.5 times assessment credit to keep there mineral claims in good standing.  Ground work only gives 1 times assessment credit.

The airborne work (airborne radiometric & VTEM) they are doing on Patterson Lake South is not very expensive, and the VTEM they are doing should give drill ready targets....so no follow up ground geophysical surveys required - Just drill it!!

GLTA 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>