MGMT UPDATE. Q4 2012 for Steady State? Terry:
[S] Back on June 28, 2009 (Google: tonnes per face manshift), we discussed the potential scenarios we are now facing. i.e. How do we compare the BF UG to C/147 Zones. Meaning the oversized equipment that was replaced (equipment assumed in the NI 43-101) had a certain productivity assigned to it by an (Time and Motion Study, Industrial Engineering) IE department. Terms discussed would include tonnes per face manshift (UG versus C147 OP). There is also a "yardstick" called, "tonnes per haulage manshift".
Anyway, the cost per ounce poured will have another potential source of reductions as the overheads and tonnes broken per face M/S and tonnes hauled per M/S are introduced from C147.
BWDIK? What is the mandate for the "interim CE'? As s/he is critical to BRD PPS going foward.
As early as 1987, I had regular discussions with (U of T Geology prof) George Kent of Glimmer., I also had discussions with Exall/Denison, CMD & Glimmer personnel. Thus re-iterating I'm here based on the promise of the PROPERTY. BRD appears to be making all the right moves to unlock the "promise of the PROPERTY".
Cheers
Stanley