Qsolar Ltd. QSLRF

RE: canaccord

[illumination1]

upanddown, be careful of overgeneralizing. i trade through canaccord because that is the main brokerage in vancouver. i don't like them either--i have heard they are cutting blocks to support (from other publicly traded companies) when they underwrite equities and then start to dump shares, but the point being we don't know who those people are, trading through canaccord--it may be another private investor like myself. like i said, i have paid premium prices for this company--my latest acquisition at .30 was just that--in regards to management, i hope they come around--if patent protection is a worry about spraytek because it can be reversed-engineered (most likely relatively easily) then there are balances to this: (1) don't involve the chinese, (2) i don't think it is only the spray which gives our solar cells high energy efficiency but also the process that we are using--so even if someone copies the spray they don't know our exact process (3) we have kruciwatt and crystal products which others don't seem to have--these are other sources of revenue streams so putting the spraytek for licensing seems to be the most logical way of doing things while being able to bring in revenue which can definitely help us and speed things along. i would actually avoid the wholesale model like a plague--when i have read about it especially in light with the solar industry--and it is proving to be very true--the reports have stated there isn't any money there. carmanah cmh uses a wholesale model i believe and it hasn't done anything spectacular--the highest their equity ever reached was $4 but then again, they seem to be focusing on solar lights that can endure the toughest of environmental conditions, office lights, airport lights etc. but not towards trying to increase cell efficiency as to my knowledge which we are doing--this i think will be the big difference between us and other solar companies who are focusing on increasing cell efficiency while working towards grid parity. natcore's balance on the side was a very smart one--the arboxes have been designed where 20% of the component is a computer based one with a very specific software. if anyone tries to tinker with the arboxes the machine will not work--and the machine is needed to uniformly coat the solar waffers to the exact consistency and proper time sequences etc. for them to be optimally efficient (at least that is what has been stated)--natcore didn't simply sell the chemical compound--so i can understand to that extent about spraytek, however, if you are afraid of being ripped off after  everything possible could be done to protect your technology then it may be better not to put anything out there--who knows maybe management has a very specific plan which will totally disprove everything that i am saying--if they do, fantastic because i'm all about our shared success and will definitely love to be wrong--i couldn't care less about my ego here--i will take massive profit over it any day =) i guess we will just have to wait and see what the company comes up with--i'm just throwing things out there. glta