Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF



GREY:TWNNF - Post by User

Post by letsgetreadyon Feb 29, 2012 1:08pm
736 Views
Post# 19605610

RAYMOND JAMES COMMENTS

RAYMOND JAMES COMMENTS

comments not too bad but maybe RJ should comment on the 6.1 million ounces of high grade stuff then

from RJ:

TRR reported a resource update at its flagship 92.5%-interest Cote Lake deposit, Ontario. The new resource totals 239 Mt grading 0.90 g/t for 6.87 Moz, at a 0.3 g/t cut-off (14% Indicated, 86% Inferred). Compared to the previous (Mar-07-11) resource, tonnages are +82%, grades are -10% and contained metal is +63%. A LT gold price of US$1,500/oz was assumed (vs. US$1,200/oz in March 2011) and drilling through September 2011 was included. Our view is that deposits in the >6 Moz range are rare, potentially making TRR a more visible target for a takeout by a major, and we remain confident Cote will be developed, particularly with sustained strength in gold prices. However, our takeaway is tempered by the 10% drop in grades – a corroboration of TRR’s reduced exploration success rate in the past 12 months (particularly the SW portion of the deposit) and poorer potential economics (on a cash cost basis).

__________________________________________________________________________________

poorer economics??..this comment must be on a per ounce basis, as even if they make only $100 per ounce on the low grade stuff..then overall profit will be $100 higher..that is TRR will make more money and be worth more. we need to deal in terms of overall dollars..hopefully the PEA will show that.

 

 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>