Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Mega Precious Metals Inc MPRXF



GREY:MPRXF - Post by User

Comment by hrattleon Mar 03, 2012 5:47pm
144 Views
Post# 19622830

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Here is my take

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Here is my take

Prove the numbers are wrong please!

Here are your numbers.

Every JR dreams about getting to that magical number of 1 mill oz...

Pure speculation - NOT a fact. My speculation is that their dreams involve naked women especially for the miners working at MB.

MB has almost 3 mill with grades of 2.5g

MB has 1,046,010 ozs M&I with grades of 2.5g/t. Inferred of 1,726,674 ozs with grades of 3.78g/t. You should NEVER combine M&I with inferred so you are mis-using this number. The only reason to combine these is to present a better picture - just like 3P does when he pumps.

compared to GCU of 1.26g and TRR of under 1g

GCU does report indicated @ 1.26g/t and TRR does report under 1 g/t - so both these are facts (and also irrelevant).

With the possibilites of MB growing to 4 mill oz and beyond...

Again pure speculation - so NOT a fact.

In summary, you presented 4 sets of numbers. 2 are pure speculation, 1 is an incorrect use to pump the stock and the other appears factual but irrelevant.

But as I said I have no issue with your numbers - just your conclusion that everyone who thinks MB should be discounted knows nothing about gold juniors - this is patently false. Indeed those who discount MB are more likely to be proficient in assessing gold juniors. It is more likely that those who add up M&I to inferred resource don't really know much about gold juniors.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>