Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tamerlane Ventures Inc. V.TAM



TSXV:TAM - Post by User

Comment by CalifDreamingon Mar 04, 2012 10:38pm
346 Views
Post# 19625375

RE: RE: Something I noticed

RE: RE: Something I noticed

<<Nobody seems to have the answer as to why the 60 million financing did not take place back in June, 2011>>

.

Come on. The answer is glaringly obvious:  Beyond R-190, the rest of PP is effectively worthless at long term metal prices.  And that is TAM's Achille's Heel - nobody is interested in financing a play what amounts to an 18 month economic mine life - everything beyond R-190 struggles to swap 4 quarters for a dollar at long term prices, so where's the economic justification for doing that?  Answer: None (unless you get a fat royalty off the top, regardless of profitability, like Peggy and The Rummy have dealt themselves.  That it reeks of self-dealing and massive conflict of interest shouldn't surprise anyone if you know anything about that pair's history)

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>