RE: RE: RE: What we now know Hi Oscar:
Thank you for your clarification. About 6 weeks ago an individual who appears to be well
educated in the Mining Industry advised me:
43-101- should be based on 1200 strike x 400 width x 165 depth x 2.65 rock density x 0.6 /3l.1 = 4,049,131 oz
So, conservatively 3.5 - 3.8M ozs, he then went on to say, I believe it will be based on:
1125x400x150x2.65x0.6/31.1 = 3,450,964 ozs of gold, then I multiplied x 94% recovery = 3,250,000 ozs
It is fun guessing, but we just have to wait for numbers from SGS. They are the pros.
It does appear 0.6g/t is the number of choice.
I have been told from people that know Frank Basa that he is conservative and sounds to me to be
a decent guy. So, hopefully we will not be disappointed. Better we guess a lower number and be
pleasantly surprised.