Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bridge Resources Corp V.BUK



TSXV:BUK - Post by User

Bridge Resources Corp > BUK Halted Pending news
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by Bob_Branton Mar 06, 2012 2:22pm
393 Views
Post# 19634365

RE: RE: RE: BUK Halted Pending news

RE: RE: RE: BUK Halted Pending news

I'll defer to you on the costs but the likelyhood of shipping LNG around is pretty low in my estimation.

Yes, it would be great if it was possible but these pools aren't that large and there is a local need. Low cost to supply makes the low cost to sell profitable anyway.

 At this point any profitable alternative is going to be roundly applauded.

<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities