Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Camrova Resources Inc V.CAV.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  BAJFF

Camrova Resources Inc. is a Canada-based mining company. The Company operates in one business segment, being the acquisition, exploration and development of resource properties. It has a minority investment in the El Boleo copper-cobalt-zinc-manganese deposit located near Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico. In addition, the Company intends to investigate and potentially pursue alternative project opportunities.


TSXV:CAV.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by investornoton Mar 07, 2012 9:11am
431 Views
Post# 19637301

RE: RE: RE: RE: NPV (discounted (8%) -- BAJA

RE: RE: RE: RE: NPV (discounted (8%) -- BAJA

MrX2 and Doug. Thanks for the confirmation about the 8% rate being high once we start production. Been a few years since I worked with present value analysis and discounted revenue streams, so excuse the cobwebs.

 

One thing I remember is that beyond a 25 year projection the numbers were such that it had little impact on the current valuation. Unless there is a significant break in the timeline for revenue (as would be the case here with Manganese production being added - value TBD) the value should not change significantly using the same discount rate if it was projected out 50 years instead.

 

John G. and the Board have always been on the conservative end of things and I took their 8% as being the high end of an appropriate discount rate when it was first announced. That makes a major difference in the NPV numbers if future revenues are discounted at a lower rate once production starts.

 

And, MrX2, the Board will not project possible future values, other than in general terms. John G. in his last conference call was asked that exact question and he stated that he believes (without Mn) that the project will yield a net profit of 80 cents a share. The markets will dictate where the price will be but it is typically a multiple of the income per share, and falls around 10-15 in many cases. He suggested to the caller to "pick his multiplier". That answer regretably did not satisfy the caller who claimed to hold 7MM shares and hopefully is voting GOLD.

Bullboard Posts