Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

BRALORNE GOLD MINES LTD BPMSF



GREY:BPMSF - Post by User

Comment by miningman3on Mar 07, 2012 9:29pm
361 Views
Post# 19641267

Optimism at the extreme??

Optimism at the extreme??

 Well,  I was unaware of the new presentation and its contents.  Company press releases have  documented that   average daily thruput thru the mill   was  less than 60 tons per day for both the last 5 months as well as since April.  Am I the only individual who thinks that   for a group that  claims their focus is a 500tpd facility, when that same group  cant get better than 60%  availabilty  thru the existing 100  tpd facility ,  there is an element of  unreality  here???.

 I also note that  page 10 of this  presentattion  shows  the BK broken  resource  is both 0.167 ounces per ton  or  13.71  grams / tonne.. Whoever did this conversion needs a new battery in their calculator.  Sure a simple  typo error might be an explanation but it doesnt say muvch for the professionalism of the people who put this together.

And for page 12  to claim  that 2011 mill tonnage was 85tpd,  is a bit of an exaggeration since press releases  show it to be less than 60 tpd.

Collectively these errors and exaggerations are coming real close to contrvening 43-101 regulations... maybe not  a true contravention ,  but again i wouldnt be surprised to see a regulatory imposed retraction... AGAIN!!!!!!!

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>