GREY:AVNDF - Post by User
Comment by
themangokidon Mar 09, 2012 11:13am
373 Views
Post# 19649291
RE: RE: RE: RE: 2% gas ?
RE: RE: RE: RE: 2% gas ? I think BC said the CEO gave him the 2% number during a meeting. It was obvious that BC thought this was a positive. I'm not so sure however. having your nat.gas production represent 2% of your cashflow (or revenue) would mean that their nat.gas $$ have plunged or their $$ from oil production have dramatically ramped up. Maybe a little of both. However, I dont think avf's oil production has increased to a point where it dwarfs their nat.gas cashflow.
Anyway, it was only the coles notes version of the explanation that BC gave us. I imagine avf's ceo went into quite a bit more detail regarding the stability of their div. So despite my uneasy feeling about this 2% number, I'll elect to side with BC and continue to think the div is secure for the time being. Year end numbers should give more insight regarding this discussion.