REPLY: Kam Daily News Mar 15 That's a very small number indeed " 40 " from the aberdeen area of approx. 1000 population.
I imagine the recent news release didn't do anything to help the cause of those opposed " UBC sciences prof, states, and quite clearly put, he will not be sticking his neck out, and specifically note, that he was called in by those that are opposed to Ajax / KGHM . This is a resounding defeat, by those that remain opposed " and also I shared some other commentary on March 9th, regarding :
" this sciences prof. knows full well, that if any other sciences prof. of equal or higher levels of training, were called in, say by - Ajax / KGHM that it would easily be proved that the current air quality conditions in Kamloops are within the acceptable guidelines, and it cannot be proved ( only speculation - that's not science ) that the air quality, even with the presence of the Ajax / KGHM mining operation, would degrade outside of those acceptable air quality guidelines . "
I went online and listened to some CFJC Radio - Kamloops commentary this morning regarding, and it was stated that this was a very poor showing, considering it was called as a specific meeting for the 1000 approx. population in the Aberdeen area, nearest the mine .
This reflects well, for his Goldbuyers investment in Ajax / KGHM - AME, as it is probably indicative and a good indicator of the majority of Kamloopsians population, whom want the many upside benefits of what the Ajax / KGHM mine, has offered.
After all ? you have to remember, it isn't " the tail " that gets to wag " the dog " in a democracy - not yet anyways . It's the needs of the many that will always outweigh the needs of few, last time , I looked ?
I don't see much support ??? purportionally and honestly, verses the over 100,000 plus population in Kamloops, BC. that are opposed ? As an investor, I quite clearly see that the financial benefits for the Kamloops community, far outweigh, any negative impact in the consideration, IMHO .
No worries from me . April is fast approaching and I am expecting some upside development - then .
To be clear, my comments are pertaining to Ajax / KGHM - AME only, on this BB, which is a NI 43-101 compliant mine with a " proven " resource established and not " any other mining claim " in the area, without any such resource established or applying to be National Instrument 43-101 compliant .
Best Regards : GoldBuyer
=================================================================================