Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mega Brands Inc MBLKF



GREY:MBLKF - Post by User

Comment by langeron Mar 15, 2012 2:38pm
243 Views
Post# 19675871

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Q results

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Q results

 

Ummm ya you can. If it's an expense due to "cost of sale" it will flow straight through to "net" as well. An expense is an expense. It's value of the specific expense doesn't change because you change the analysis from gross to net.

 In terms of the 2.6 vs net 2011 profit, I'm afraid that is exactly how that works. If all things are equal (sales, expenses, etc ... ) and the only thing that changes is resin pricing increases 10% then it will have the exact impact of the expense increase to net profit. With the full knowledge that all business are variable and do change the impact will be relative to the amount of resin that is required but it will still be true impact to net. The only thing that might change this is if there were special tax rebates related directly to resin purchase that wouldn't be shown in gross.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>