RE: 2016>>nice Yes, I credit you for me buying the stock, and so far it's been good decision (on the green side and willing to buy more..., cheaply). The thing is the stock is owned only by three entities and the rest is spread between retailers. Therefore takeover should be profitable for retailers (no major backdoor deals!), Foster doesn't want to get diluted (however more options is always a possibility, but at this moment that would indicate major deal pending). Chinese outfit is happy with their chinese options, Palladin wants to cash on the intellectual and othere rights and koreans want it all just like swiss guys. The only obstacle in the equation are retailers, how to get rid off the retailers? Seems like they don't want to sell (at least cheaply)..., on the 2nd level you can see that quite clearly. I summarized the position the retailers are in, pretty comfortable position, as long as somebody got in below 15 or so cents and doesn't have financial liabilities somewhere else. Obviously, I don't expect the price to go back to$6 or $7/share, but I will wait while sipping my cognac. On personal note, I feel bad for you if you bought in the stock too high or you lost the job with ISA , that would explain your bitterness. And please, one verbial a week, leave some spots for other posters. By the way, I enjoy your writings, found them amusing and kind of entertaining. Cheers.G.