GREY:WFEMF - Post by User
Post by
fattailon Mar 28, 2012 10:06am
364 Views
Post# 19727058
Dumb Question
Dumb Question OK I am not a techie in tungsten processing but there is something here that I just don't understand.
Assumptions used in August 2011 Glanville Valuation
- WO3 recovery of 81% to concentrate and MoS2 recovery of 85% to concentrate
- 96% recovery of WO3 from concentrate to APT (containing 89% WO3)
In the same document they refer to Wardrup using
production of APT at a grade of 79% WO3 at 95% recovery
So now we hear today: This has resulted in the production of concentrate grades of more than 70% WO3 at recoveries above 85%.
So when they are talking 15% above historical, are they talking historical being earlier Sangdong mining in the early 90s?