Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Granada Gold Mine Inc V.GGM

Alternate Symbol(s):  GBBFF

Granada Gold Mine Inc. is a Canada-based junior natural resource company. The principal business of the Company is the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral property interests. The Company is engaged in developing and exploring its 100% owned Granada Gold Property near Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, which is adjacent to the Cadillac Break. The Granada Gold Property is located five kilometers south of the mining community of Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec. The property includes the former Granada Gold underground mine. The Company owns about 14.73 square kilometers of land from a combination of mining leases and claims. The Granada deposit is a quartz-vein mesothermal gold deposit hosted by late Archean Timiskaming sedimentary rock and younger syenite porphyry dykes.


TSXV:GGM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by miktoneon Apr 03, 2012 2:12pm
295 Views
Post# 19754046

cuts off and RE growth

cuts off and RE growth

I was hoping for someone to comment on the following questions... How much more of a resource should we expect when the grade cut-of is lowered (the NR contained lower cut-off data which appeard to raise the numbers to the tune of 20%)? Also there were comments yesterday of using the holes with 1 gram cut-offs, how much more would we go up of we were more inclusive, and is this realistic? And finally how much more could the next RE go up, if we incorporated the final 80 or so holes. I ask these questions because, to my way of thinking I don't see how the 2nd could be sooo much bigger based on these factors. Hopefully someone can enlighten me.

Bullboard Posts