RE: consider your options That doesnt seem like considering our options...that seems like you trying to argue that we either get 0.14-0.26 or nothing. And given that you are referencing all of one analyst from an informal interview where there is no actual information drawn upon it's a pretty flimsy argument to be making. You have literally posted the link to an article where an analyst at an investment firm is asked questions, and the analyst offers unsubstantiated opinions, with no explanation for why he is arguing that shareholders will receive nothing if they vote no to the asset sale. Sorry but that kind of ludacris logic is the same b.s. that RBC's 'fair' valuation has proven to be.
I can understand you expressing your support for the asset deal if that is what you believe is right for you and your current share position (I would guess you recently bought in under 0.26). However, I suggest you actually find some credible articles and numbers to back up your arguments...because so far it's pretty clear to 20% of First Uranium shareholders that the asset sale is bad idea.