Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Stream Oil & Gas Ltd SOGAF



GREY:SOGAF - Post by User

Post by newtoboard.on Apr 05, 2012 6:55pm
346 Views
Post# 19765622

Secondary Plateau Production

Secondary Plateau Production

Looking over the releases by stream, there appears to be an emphasis upon tertiary recovery options for achieving their long term produciton goals >10k bopd.

As this is a bit beyond my timeframe {and I'm a bit skeptical about the effectiveness/costs of WAG or thermal for what look to be fractured carbonates given the structure (anticline with high net?) and lack of a cheap miscible gas(?) <-- Only a brief observation, could be mistaken on the assets} I'm interested in what the consensus is for the potential for more common production optimization and improved/implemented secondary recovery. 

The potential from simple production engineering is apparent (jet pumps, work overs, reacivations, etc).  But for 2012-14, I love the res management/dev opporunities.  A couple observations:

If I recall, the medium visc field has not yet been brought to 2ndary recovery (?).  I struggle to see how this won't become a wonderful candidate in the near futuer (odd that it wasn't before.  Rationale?)

Have they considered using simple HPAM polymer flooding (the k is above 100mD, right?) to reduce watercut and provide a substantial improvement in incremental recovery.  Cross-linking polymers and ASP seem a bit off on a sunk cost basis, although I can see the potential here.

Will probably add a couple others in the future..... Any idea of what the company may be looking at achieving from only secondary recovery/IOR (non-tertiary)?  I could quite easily see plateau >5-10kbopd, but would love to hear other's comments.

Note-- Many tertiary options have substiantial up front facilities and chemicals/gas costs while the response can take months to years (especially with interwell methods like ASP, miscible gas).  Not the best place for a junior to play IMO

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>