RE: RE: RE: Strange Bed fellows Regardless, Ark, I don't see any shareholder by that name on the list of share holders and you may be right; they could be two different companies. But my point is whether CMK, if requested by a shareholder, i.e., a part owner of the company, has a right to privy info and if not who does and why. And I hear from some people or quasi proxies of CMK(?) that the company has no obligation to that effect. It's attitudes like this that have encouraged corporate secrecy and defiance of the common shareholder by the insiders and the abuses we hear all the time in Wall Street and Bay Sreet. We need activist shareholders or the abuses will get worse. Trust me.