Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Camrova Resources Inc V.CAV.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  BAJFF

Camrova Resources Inc. is a Canada-based mining company. The Company operates in one business segment, being the acquisition, exploration and development of resource properties. It has a minority investment in the El Boleo copper-cobalt-zinc-manganese deposit located near Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico. In addition, the Company intends to investigate and potentially pursue alternative project opportunities.


TSXV:CAV.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by dgh7on May 02, 2012 4:59pm
307 Views
Post# 19863515

Catalyst and Greenslade

Catalyst and Greenslade

Catalyst Options at 10¢?

 

Options for ten years? (Subject to regulatory approval).  Is there a regulator in the country who would approve of ten-year options?  Is there another CEO in the country who would request regulatory approval for ten-year options?  Is there any other publicly traded Canadian company who has requested regulatory approval for ten-year option?

 

Why, in the name of God, does Mr. Greenslade insists on publicly shooting himself in the foot?  Is this a demonstration of sheer stupidity or utter arrogance?  Isn't is bad enought to have six outside independent directors resign with 12 months?  A few months ago, in a prior post, I characterized his award of two million Baja options (given in 2010) as obscene.  I still hold to that position.  Now we have the spectacle of greater obscenity:  ten-year option

 

I doubt if anyone on this board would claim that I am a basher of either Mr. Greeslade or Baja Mining Corp.  That does not make my opinions right or wrong.  Let me express my personal opinions in the form of four questions:

 

1.  Is there a regulator in the country who would approve of ten-year options?

 

2. IIs there another CEO in the country who would request regulatory approval for ten-year options?

 

3. Is there any other publicly traded Canadian company which has requested regulatory approval for ten-year options?  If so, what company?

 

4.  Has any Canadian publicly traded company  received regulatory approval for ten-year options?

 

Sorry John but this non-Baja news item might be the straw that broke the camel's back.  If it is, you have no person to blame but youself.  The British have a saying, "Too smart by half".  On Howe Street, I translate that as "Too greedy by half".

 

I still support Baja Mining Corporation and the Boleo Project.  I still do not support Mount Kellett.  I absolutely refuse to support ten-year options.  I refuse to support greed and obscenity.  I don't even support five-year options!  Stupid me, I thought that Murray Pezim was already dead and burried.  John, today you lost it.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Doug.

Bullboard Posts