Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Seafield Resources Ltd V.SFF



TSXV:SFF - Post by User

Post by PublicRelationson May 03, 2012 4:22am
500 Views
Post# 19864983

Value collapse

Value collapse

Also junior companies have "done" it to themselves to a large extent by learning how to manipulate 43-101 calculations such that it is fairly common to see one million + ounce resources today, but when the metallurgy and other factors get applied these resources often shrink like a raisin in the sun, often by 60 to 75% - a perfect example of this recently was Seafield (V.SFF) in Colombia who were listed on your valuation table Just take a look at their 43-101 in relation to their PEA just released.

https://www.stockhouse.com/Columnists/2012/Apr/27/Junior-gold-valuation-table-April-update--Stockhou

... opinions? thx.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse