RE: RE: Kutessay-II Kettl take a look at the original, it clearly says 07-05-12, 17:37
moreover this number perfectly fits with the plans of stans' to process 1m tons of Re's p.a.
it is obvious that the 1m is just the number of processed ore per year
I found the number for the stockpilled ore interesting, the article states it would last 56 y. for 250t p.a. so for 1m p.a. this would mean 14 years of processing without any actual mining
they already talked about that stockpilled ore but if I am not mistaken stans said it would last for 1-2 years, this would make a huge difference in operating cost if the kyrgyz numbers are true
this would certainly have a very positive effect on the PFS resulting in a higher NPV