RE: RE: RE: RE: One well or two?? Zibo re: "Spudding ES was decided based on limited funds and meeting the requirements of the PPL, not on where the best drill location was."
Not sure I follow that line of reasoning. CGX info states that they have many prospective targets, so why would they have to stick to Eagle, if more recent seismic information presented better targets? Seems to me that they have always viewed Eagle as a very good prospect to strike oil.