Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

First Uranium Corporation T.FIU



TSX:FIU - Post by User

Comment by lefmike1on May 12, 2012 8:12am
151 Views
Post# 19902149

RE: RE: No to the sale of Ezuwini

RE: RE: No to the sale of Ezuwini

dubsbs

I think... it's actually quite simple, 

if we let this thing go to dilution we ( shareholders) would be diluted into oblivion, Originally we did not know we had the right to NOT go to dilution... So if we did dilute, , the June 2012 bondholders would have a vast majority control and we know where their sympathies lie...with Management as they were promised full payment regrdless of how much money goes to teh shareholders. 

.

Now if we were to NOT approve the dilution and because the dilution would entail more than 25% of the Cap ( that is my understanding  if I'm wrong please let me and us know)  but if it's more than 25% of the total Cap it has to be approved by the shareholders.  So since we have to approve the dilution it's best not to in this situation,, then we force the June 2012 note holders hand and attempt to force us into receivership.

If we go there (receivership), 1st of all, Anglo Gold who owns 20% of the whole company will be in line like the rest of us. 

Do you think they would let this thing go?

They have invested millions here, they want the facility it will blend quite nicely with their other nearby properties and being the smooth operators that they are they were thinking they could get it for a son.. 

 W R O N G

They will be in the same line like everyone else if they don;t come up with a major improvement. 

.

They know the value in this property just with what is in the present tailings ponds.here,  what close to a billion dollars is it?  what happens when they connect their own tailings ponds. 

.

Now would you in your right mind let your original investment of 28 million dollars, or 47 million shares be put into the hands of a receiver?  Not on your life!  You will do what is needed to get control of the operation (s)  Meaning after the votes are cast, and let's say they are all NO  then AGA will more than likely step up to the plate and offer something they feel that will pass mustard......

They do not want to take the chance on this getting into the hands of another interested buyer. I'm sure there are some out there but the BOD at FIU more than likely ignored them all.

Anyway my long winded answer to you is  right now... It's best we lean strongly to ward NO on most of FIU's recommendations I appologize if I took too long in this answer. I hope this helps.

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>