From the Quantec Report Page 18.
"The interpreted results do not necessarily represent mineralization, mineral grade and or the full extent of the sources of the anomaly and furthermore, are not intended for metal differentiation. Different geological, structural and mineral assemblages may produce anomalies with similar response amplitude, shape, orientation and size."
In other words, a geophysical anomaly detected by a Titan 24 survey could be something other than mineralization. Huh. Who would've thunk it? I guess the only way to determine whether or not an anomaly is actually minerization is to drill it. But I thought geological surveys as precise as Titan 24 could be used to calculate resources estimates and sell properties without having to drill. At least that's what some people have been saying, right, Sculpin?