Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Seafield Resources Ltd V.SFF



TSXV:SFF - Post by User

Comment by doctorfillon Jun 07, 2012 1:39pm
412 Views
Post# 19990106

RE: RE: Anonymous

RE: RE: Anonymous

Brien Lundin May 24 2012

 

Seafield's preliminary assessment for the Miraflores deposit in Colombia estimates a $249-million net present value, assuming a gold price of $1,500 an ounce. It also estimates total production of 185,180 ounces gold over 14 years, with cash costs at only $524 an ounce for the first eight years. Metallurgical test results show recovery rates between 95 and 97 per cent, for gravity concentration followed by flotation from tailings. Mr. Lundin notes Seafield has a high upside potential, given a market cap of only $23.6-million. As well as Miraflores, Seafield owns the Dosquebradas gold deposit, also in Colombia.

Why is SFF so cheap? Something out of alignment here.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>