RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Macleod on battery po During your conversation with Norman did the expected costs associated to the 1 year program come up as a topic? It would have been the natural extension to your line of query.The expected costs for the program would have been reviewed by AMY in order for them to prioritize it as an area to expend a portion of current cash in the kitty.
Are you willing to share the complete conversation you had with Norman only hours ago? What did you ask specifically ... what were his answers specifically? Don't tell me you only asked if the program was pay as you go or pre-paid.
The company has priorotized work programs based on tech report recommendations and has committed to pushing ahead on the battery program. In order to make those determinations ... the CFO would have certainly been involved ... so not sure why you are so suspect of the companies ability to meet its prioritized liabilities.
Obviously dilution going forward is your concern ... as it is every investors ... on the otherhand ... Larry Reaugh has indicated getting a partner is of high focus over the next quarter ... Mike Macleod is buying up shares ... and the latest update mentioned "pleased to report that the Company continues to cultivate strategic partnering relationships with EMM end users and emerging rechargeable battery end users" ... so ... looking at things through that lense ... things look to be getting plenty interesting in the near future.
If you do find out specific cost parameters ... please share ... I'm not suggesting it wouldn't be of interest if it were made known ... just that it isn't of particular concern in the manner you present ... not for this investor anyway.