RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ne glenfarclas, I should have known better than to trust your numbers. They are deceiving since you included stocks and options in her pay and I did not include them in Brennan's pay. So she did NOT earn $3,311,116 like you state. Typical misleading liberal
Christine Day's "compenstation" is as follows:
SALARY $646,771
Bonus $951,789 which they call "non-equity" incentive
Other $ 7,557 I'm guessing those are personal/reimbursable expenses
Stock $1,416,750
Options $588,250
Since I didn't count stock or options in Brennan's "compensationg" either [and the "other" that Ms Day received was not salary then HER money compensation was $1,598,500 and Brennan's "compensation" [also excludive of stock/options] was $840,000. Brennan has 3,300,000 shares under option. Clealy it's impossible to compare one company and one compensation with another but Lululemon is BY FAR the better company for rewarding it's shareholders and Largo is a dog by comparison. Mark Brennan is GROSSLEY over paid - even his base salary before that whopping $550,000 "bonus" - for what we can only guess. Sure wasn't for adding value to the shareholders - except for the "investors" like Arias, Eton Park et al.