Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Galway Resources Ltd V.GWY



TSXV:GWY - Post by User

Comment by SchiffKnowsBeston Jun 16, 2012 1:59pm
181 Views
Post# 20021759

RE: California Valuation

RE: California Valuation

Hey NaturalCurrency,

 

A good point of discussion.

 

It all depends on the grade, cut-off, and how many ounces.  I am holding my estimate of 1.75mm ounces and having the same grade and cut-off as Ventana (grade = 3.9 , cut-off = 2.0).  As I keep pointing out, do remember that Ventana's 3.5 million ounces were inferred.  I suspect we get a blend of indicated and inferred in our 43-101.

 

If they can achieve what is above, then $200/ounce shouldn't be a stretch, especially when you throw in the strips that Eike needs for his mine to be built in the most efficient way.

 

I would then throw in a valuation of around $100 per ounce at Vetas.  The reason why the valuation is cut in half is because it's 8km away, and separate infrastructure would need to be built besides the Ventana deposit.

 

Keep in mind that all of this if dependent on us only having Eike as a bidder.  All bets are off if we get a white knight!

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>