Success? There are a couple of telling phrases used in their news release. They refer first to "markedly improved flow rates" and then later to "gas flow rates". Translation: they fracked and brought in the ocean. That would have shown on logs before fracking, unless by some delusion they thought it was oil instead of water. Both have the same log characteristics. I suspect they used too big a frack with their fingers crossed.
"The flow rates tested to date are not considered reliable indications.....and are therefore not reported" Translation: They don't want to tank the stock even further because right now it is not good news. Releasing flow rates and water cut would be factual and useful information, but they don't want the market to know. Instead, they pick up the dice once more and hope that they can squeeze off the water zone. Normally, it would be lower and there may well be success. The problem is that there is so much water that they cannot dehydrate at surface, hence the gamble of a cement squeeze.
What's worse, they didn't have a contingency plan for this and now must go far afield to get the right equipment. Not too smart.
This is not an open and transparent issuer, regardless of results.