RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Proof is in the pudding - Insi So now, ggrellette what do you decide now? You have warned us looking at the bad structure of holdings from the insiders. Thank you very much! Perhaps it would be the best - if you allow me to give you an advice - to sell your shares and move on to a company which fits your imagination from correctness. I hold these shares from GNG because I am of the opinion that Paul and his team will do all the best to reach the goal of finding and developing a great mineable resource. Perhaps they made some faults on the way to this goal but they were always focussing on it in an earnest manner. There was never any sign of the behaviour you are warning on now. You said I am one of those "pumpers" from the boards and yes I have all the reasons to be positive because I am long in this company and when I say I am long I am speaking from a substantial holding (at least for myself). But if someone enters this board with a totally unfunded warning about a possible behaviour of insiders in the future and simultaniously declaring he is a shareholder of the company he is warning on, then - sorry - there is a decent possibility this poster is a basher (he is short or he is paid to hold the share price down) holding not a single share. THIS behaviour is really strange because why should anyone holding shares from a company do such harm to himself? So if you are short or if you are a paid basher (there are some companies surrounding GNG which could have every interest to hold the share price down...) it´s very logical that I will fight you nails and teeth because I want the share price to go UP. If you are a saver of mankind - again thank you for your warnings - I have noticed them but now I think every one has understood your point and can decide to sell his shares if assured. This is again what I would recommend for you IF you really have some shares from GNG to immediately end your doubting. Sorry for the offense but I think you get the point...
F