Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CanAsia Energy Corp V.CEC

Alternate Symbol(s):  CECAF

CanAsia Energy Corp. is a Canada-based junior oil and gas company. The Company is engaged in the exploration for, and the acquisition, development and production of, crude oil and natural gas reserves. The Company, through its subsidiary, Andora Energy Corporation, is focused on developing the bitumen resources at the Sawn Lake property using steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) development. The Company has working interests in, four heavy oil sand leases with 27 sections (24.25 net sections) of Sawn Lake Alberta Crown oil sands leases within the Alberta Peace River Oil Sands area. In the Sawn Lake Central area, it operates with a 100% working interest in two oil sands leases with 11 gross sections (8.25 net sections). In the Sawn Lake South area, it operates with a 100% working interest in three oil sands leases with 16 gross sections (16 net sections).


TSXV:CEC - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Sonny7on Jul 30, 2012 10:36am
265 Views
Post# 20164775

RE: :Origins of mud gas

RE: :Origins of mud gas

"Mud pressure was 600 psi in the first sidetrack, which would suggest an influx of reservoir gas boosting the mud gas readings.However, no gas kicks were reported".

The 600psi reading came from extrapolating final mud weight over well depth to show the 600psi increase. Influx still means a flow into the well, therefore no kick. There is nothing to show an influx of gas into the wellbore, only mud gas from drilling.

 

"In the second sidetrack over the same interval but extended another 250 ft deeper, much higher mud weights were used and , as expected, the mud gas readings were lower............presumably, these higher mud weights restrained the influx of reservoir gas"

With higher mud weights comes higher hydrostatic pressure PLUS added pressure to the formation from the resistance created from the dynamic forces of circulating drilling mud under pump pressure. The gas at the edges of the outside diameter of the wellbore would have been squeezed back into the formation from the added drilling fluid pressures created by heavier mud weight and thereby a reduction of drilled background gas

 

"If one were to standardize for the effect of mud weights ( ie remove its effect on mud gas due to the influx of rerservoir gas ) on mud gas readings, I would expect that the conclusion might be that of robust reservoir gas over portions of the 600 ft or so of the upper sands.

Strong reservoir gas cannot exist in tight sandstones, as most of the gas remains trapped within the low permeability rock".

There is that "I" word again. There was no INFLUX reported, only that word was used. An influx is the flowing of reservoir fluids/gasses into the wellbore while involved in a drilling operation.

The statement on reservoir gas and gas entrapment in low permeable rock is wrong. As long as there is permeability there will be flow. If the formation is tight then fracing can be used to enhance flow.

 

There was no influx or kick, well flow reported, but there were significant mud weight increases, With the new mud weights reported then we still have to assume that these upper sands are still considered to be overpressured.

 

"But, I am not an expert"

Not many are considered to be experts but it is becoming apparent that you are not in a learning frame of mind either. I don't post to blow smoke and I only write about what I know to be true. I feel good to help folks understand the operational side of some of the pieces of well drilling so if they are interested, then I am hopeful that what I write is clear to readers and can be absorbed.

 

 

 

 

 

.

Bullboard Posts