Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Comment by shellfish1on Jul 30, 2012 11:17pm
285 Views
Post# 20167524

RE: RE: RE:RE: Reserection attempt of NAG

RE: RE: RE:RE: Reserection attempt of NAG

This is certainly a joke. However, the TSX authority won't care this kind of scam as long as the company meet the minimum listing standards. It is totally the sharehollders' responsibility for shaping the CEO's behavior. 

However, at each annual meeting, no body says no so that this lie continues like a legend. I wonder who are these shareholders, why you guays still vote yes althouhg have already being f... from inside out.     

$600,000 is just the amount of money for overhead. The lie starts over again. Put your money elsewhere.   

Shellfish 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>