Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

RE: RE: RE: Permit Application...

[RavenPortSpinWatch]

bestguesstoo I have always found it extremely amusing how people create an argument that was not posited, and then argue against that self-contrived argument to come to a conclusion on a premise that wasn't even put forth.  For example, "don't go on and on about the First Nations people being against development".  Where did that come from in any of my posts?  Silly me, I know the answer to that question.  It didn't come from me did it?  In fact, it can only be found in your own post.  Let's have a semblence of integrity of context in these exchanges shall we? 

I think you did accurately assess the risks you are taking and encouraging others to take in your statement "First Nations concerns might be resolved...."  But of course that cannot happen without engaging in adequate consultation can it?  Silly me again, I know the answer to that and don't have to ask the proponent or rely on obviously investor attracting biased news announcements from the proponent as my source of information to understand and grasp the elements successful projects can demonstrate and what the indicators are of projects that ultimately are very likely bound for the judicial system. 

It is up to you though whether you utilize common sense and due diligence or keep on asking questions designed to get the answer you want to hear.  It makes me wonder at what price you invested into for you to think that twisting my words into a spin like you did seemed a legitimate response.  Are you perchance trying to risk manage your portfolio from further losses by discussing due diligence of major projects and indicators of success and failures due to the proponents failure to properly access a project risk?