RE: Whats the Rumpus !!! NOBODY is claiming that NOT will end up getting 100% of the property. We were just saying that it was a possibility, as MELLOW is saying it's impossible which is misleading and is actually grounds for being sued by peopler of NOT. You are fully claiming other things than what is written in words in the terms of agreement. I would stop your misinformed posts, for your own sake MELLOW. Barrick gold sued someone on stockhouse for over $100,000 just because they claimed Barrick didn't own a particular piece of land which was false. You are doing the EXACT samething MELLOW, by claiming NOT has 0 rights to the property which is FALSE.
Anyways, as I said EAG will probably not let this property go and probably end up with 75-100% of the NOT claims, but it doesn't mean there isn't the small chance they'll lose it all. And as I stated earlier, these NOT claims are only for half of the Windfall Lake Property, yet you still claim I didn't know this MELLOW. More reading, less typing. Okay? Thanks.